A 'No' Vote On The Budget Deal Is A Vote For More Spending

A ‘no’ vote on the budget deal is a vote for more spending
By U.S. Senator David Perdue (R-GA)
Washington Examiner

When President Trump set out to negotiate a budget deal, he had two primary goals: continue to reduce discretionary spending as a percentage of the economy and fully fund our military.

Those goals were accomplished last week when the Trump administration and congressional leaders struck a deal on spending caps and the debt ceiling.

Unfortunately, many of my Senate colleagues are considering voting no on this deal, because they want to reduce spending. Well, so do I.

In this case, however, a no vote actually is a vote to increase spending over time.

Stay Connected

Name*
First Last
Email*
Mobile
Zip*
David is working to get results & keep the Republican U.S. Senate majority, but he needs your help. Will you commit to investing in our outsider movement right now?*
- Yes! I'll chip in $10.
- Yes! I'll chip in $25.
- Not right now (No worries. Your response will still be submitted, but you will be redirected a donate page in case you change your mind.)
Comments
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

*By providing your cell phone or mobile phone number you are consenting to receive calls and texts, including autodialed and automated calls and texts, to that number from Perdue For Senate.